Dry weight, root length, and nutrient (N, P, K, Ca, and S) uptake. Root length

Dry weight, root length, and nutrient (N, P, K, Ca, and S) uptake. Root length had a strong constructive correlation with plant fresh weight, leaf location, and nutrient (K and P) uptake. Fresh fresh weight, leaf area, and nutrient (K and P) uptake. Fresh positive correlation with plant weight had aasignificantlypositive correlation with nutrient (N, P,(N,and K and S) uptake, and weight had drastically constructive correlation with nutrient K P, S) uptake, and dry dry weight was substantially correlated with all nutrient absorption, specially with N weight was significantly correlated with all nutrient absorption, particularly with N uptake uptake (Pearson’s correlation coefficient: 0.849). (Pearson’s correlation coefficient: 0.849).Figure three. Correlations among plant growth parameters and plant nutrient uptake. Pearson’s correlation coefficients are are Figure 3. Correlations amongst plant development parameters and plant nutrient uptake. Pearson’s correlation coefficients presented. “” “” denotesp0.05 and “” denotes pp0.01. presented. denotes p 0.05 and “” denotes 0.01.3.four. Nutrient Use Efficiency beneath Oltipraz Autophagy Unique Flow Rates 3.4. Nutrient Use Efficiency under Distinct Flow RatesThe nutrient use efficiency below distinct substrate flow prices is shown in Figure four. Figure 4a shows that with an enhanced flow rate from 2 to four L/min, the nitrogen useAgronomy 2021, 11,use efficiency (KUE) decreased by 22.0 , while additional intensification from the flow price to 6 L/min and 8 L/min resulted in increases in KUE by 17.1 and 36.six , respectively. With an enhanced flow price from 2 to 4 L/min, the calcium use efficiency (CaUE) increased by 45.2 (Figure 4d), whilst with an enhanced flow price from four to six L/min, CaUE decreased by 27.6 . Additional increasing the flow rate from 6 to 8 L/min induced the CaUE 7 of 11 to boost by 76.7 . As can be noticed from Figure 4f, with an elevated flow rate from 2 to 4 L/min, the sulfur use efficiency (SUE) elevated by 9.2 and further escalating the flow rate to 6 efficiency (NUE) decreased in three.five , whilst with all the SUE values have been L/min at all flow L/min resulted in a lower by the SUE by 8.five .a rise from 4 to 6 similar and from 6 to except to get a NUE elevated by 19.three and 26.0 , rates eight L/min, thesignificant 54 enhance at eight L/min. respectively.(a)(b)Agronomy 2021, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW8 of(c)(d)(e)(f)Figure four. Nutrient use efficiency under various flow prices (values are calculated by dry weight/nutrient uptake of aa complete Figure four. Nutrient use efficiency under different flow prices (values are calculated by dry weight/nutrient uptake of complete plant). (a) Nitrogen use efficiency (NUE); (b)(b) phosphorus efficiency (PUE); (c) potassium use efficiency (KUE); (d) calcium plant). (a) Nitrogen use efficiency (NUE); phosphorus use use efficiency (PUE); (c) potassium use efficiency (KUE); (d) calcium use efficiency (CaUE); (e) N-Acetylcysteine amide Purity & Documentation magnesium use efficiency(f) sulfur use efficiency (SUE). There were considerable variations (MgUE); (f) sulfur use efficiency (SUE). There have been considerable use efficiency (CaUE); (e) magnesium use efficiency (MgUE); differences within the bars marked with distinct letters (p 0.05). Data are expressed as implies regular error (n = 4). in the bars marked with unique letters (p 0.05). Data are expressed as means regular error (n = 4).4. Discussion Root extension, mass flow, and diffusion would be the key forms of plant nutrients in soil moving for the root surface [19]. In contrast to soil, the culture substrate (nutrie.